A-Z Index | Phone Book | Careers

Machine Learning Enhances Predictive Modeling of 2D Materials

March 2, 2017

Contact: Kathy Kincade, kkincade@lbl.gov, +1 510 495 2124

2D Stanene Model 900px 0

Using a modeling framework built around a molecular dynamics code (LAMMPS), the researchers ran a series of simulations to study the structure and temperature-dependent thermal conductivity of stanene, a 2D material made up of a one-atom-thick sheet of tin. Image: Mathew Cherukara, Badri Narayanan, Subramanian Sankaranarayanan, Argonne National Laboratory

Researchers from Argonne National Laboratory, using supercomputers at Berkeley Lab’s National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), are employing machine learning algorithms to accurately predict the physical, chemical and mechanical properties of nanomaterials, reducing the time it takes to yield such predictions from years to months—in some cases even weeks. This approach could help accelerate the discovery and development of new materials.

Using a modeling framework built around a molecular dynamics code (LAMMPS), the research team ran a series of simulations to study the structure and temperature-dependent thermal conductivity of stanene, a 2D material made up of a one-atom-thick sheet of tin. This work, which involved a set of parameters known as the “many-body interatomic potential” or “force field” yielded the first atomic-level computer model that accurately predicts stanene’s structural, elastic and thermal properties. The findings were published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters.

In addition, by applying machine learning algorithms, the research team was able to achieve these characterizations much faster than ever before. Traditional atomic-scale materials models have taken years to develop, and researchers have had to rely largely on their own intuition to identify the parameters on which a model would be built, noted Subramanian Sankaranarayanan, a computational scientist at Argonne and team leader on The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters paper. But by using machine learning, the Argonne researchers were able to reduce the need for human input while shortening the time to craft an accurate model down to a few months.

“Characterizing a force field like this takes a really long time to do by hand—a matter of years—so machine learning is a way of automating this process, speeding it up, so that we can explore more of the parameter space than a human can do and get a faster, more accurate fit,” said Mathew Cherukara, an Argonne postdoctoral researcher and lead author on the study.

The researchers used supervised machine learning algorithms such as Genetic Algorithms combined with Simplex for optimization—algorithms that have been around for 15-20 years and are commonly used in industries such as banking and social media. “We are now applying this to materials, and that has not been done before,” Cherukara added. “And using these machine-learnt force fields, we can do more than these materials models were originally designed to do.”

Framework Not Material-Dependent

Unlike previous atomic-scale materials models, the machine learning approach can capture bond formation and breaking events accurately, yielding more reliable predictions of material properties such as thermal conductivity) and enabling researchers to capture chemical reactions more accurately and better understand how specific materials can be synthesized.

“We input data obtained from experimental or expensive theory-based calculations and then ask the machine, ‘Can you give me a model that describes all of these properties?’” said Badri Narayanan, an Argonne postdoctoral researcher and another lead author on the study.

In addition, because the process is not material-dependent, researchers can look at many different classes of materials and apply machine learning to various other elements and their combinations.

“What surprised us is that we can get more out of these models than we thought possible,” Cherukara said. “We can use, for example, the same model framework that we used for stanene to describe water—two very different materials. The underlying analytical model is the same; the difference is the numbers that go in and the parameterization of the model.”

Another surprise is how well the machine learning framework learns outside of what it is originally trained against.

“We found that if you take this model and start working on data that was not used for training, it actually does very well outside of where it was originally trained against,” Sankaranarayanan said. “The framework is so robust that it allows us to develop models well beyond what they have been trained against. And that is what you want it to be: very good in new scenarios that were not in the original training. We generally expect this model to have limited predictive power, but when you start using it in different scenarios, the predictions actually come out very good.”

The framework is already being used by other researchers at Argonne, and Sankaranarayanan and his collaborators envision it eventually being something even non-experts can use to explore materials properties.

“Right now it takes a certain amount of expertise to use it, but our goal is that pretty much anyone can use it,” Narayanan said. “The main framework already exists and is very useful for materials research; it just needs to be made a little more user friendly.”

Part of the work was performed at the Center for Nanoscale Materials (CNM) at DOE’s Argonne National Laboratory. Both CNM and NERSC are DOE Office of Science User Facilities.

This article was adapted from materials provided by Argonne National Laboratory.


About Computing Sciences at Berkeley Lab

The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) Computing Sciences organization provides the computing and networking resources and expertise critical to advancing the Department of Energy's research missions: developing new energy sources, improving energy efficiency, developing new materials and increasing our understanding of ourselves, our world and our universe.

ESnet, the Energy Sciences Network, provides the high-bandwidth, reliable connections that link scientists at 40 DOE research sites to each other and to experimental facilities and supercomputing centers around the country. The National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) powers the discoveries of 6,000 scientists at national laboratories and universities, including those at Berkeley Lab's Computational Research Division (CRD). CRD conducts research and development in mathematical modeling and simulation, algorithm design, data storage, management and analysis, computer system architecture and high-performance software implementation. NERSC and ESnet are DOE Office of Science User Facilities.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory addresses the world's most urgent scientific challenges by advancing sustainable energy, protecting human health, creating new materials, and revealing the origin and fate of the universe. Founded in 1931, Berkeley Lab's scientific expertise has been recognized with 13 Nobel prizes. The University of California manages Berkeley Lab for the DOE’s Office of Science.

DOE’s Office of Science is the single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States, and is working to address some of the most pressing challenges of our time. For more information, please visit science.energy.gov.